![]() |
Wednesday, September 7, 2005
Use of 'refugee' to describe the displaced stirs dispute
What do you call people who have been driven from their homes with only the clothes on their backs, unsure if they will ever be able to return, and forced to build a new life in a strange place?
News organizations are struggling for the right word.
Many, including The Associated Press, have used "refugee" to describe those displaced by the wrath of Hurricane Katrina.
But the choice has stirred anger among some readers and other critics, particularly in the black community. They have argued that "refugee" somehow implies that the displaced storm victims, many of whom are black, are second-class citizens -- or not even Americans.
"It is racist to call American citizens refugees," the Rev. Jesse Jackson said, visiting the Houston Astrodome on Monday. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have expressed similar sentiments.
Others have countered that the terms "evacuees" or even "displaced" are too clinical and not sufficiently dramatic to convey the dire situation that confronts many of Katrina's survivors.
President Bush, who has spent days trying to deflect criticism that he responded sluggishly to the disaster, weighed in on Tuesday. "The people we're talking about are not refugees," he said. "They are Americans and they need the help and love and compassion of our fellow citizens."
The 1951 U.N. Refugee Convention describes a refugee as someone who has fled across an international border to escape violence or persecution. But the Webster's New World Dictionary defines it more broadly as "a person who flees from home or country to seek refuge elsewhere, as in a time of war or of political or religious persecution."
The criticism has led several news organizations to ban the word in their Katrina coverage. Among them are The Washington Post, The Miami Herald, The Boston Globe and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
"To use the term 'refugee' to describe someone taking refuge elsewhere after Hurricane Katrina does not to me seem in any way racist," said P-I Managing Editor David McCumber. "But how I see it isn't the point. A significant group of people finds the word objectionable in this context, and there are several other perfectly good words to use -- evacuee, flood victim, etc. We will use those words."
At the Herald, said executive editor Tom Fiedler, "it began to feel odd, describing people huddled in New Orleans' convention center as refugees. It felt inadequate to the situation. ... It wasn't as precise as 'evacuees.' "
And CNN has advised producers that "evacuee" is a better word, said spokeswoman Christa Robinson.
The AP and The New York Times are among those continuing to use the word where it is deemed appropriate.
"The AP is using the term 'refugee' where appropriate to capture the sweep and scope of the effects of this historic natural disaster on a vast number of our citizens," said Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll. "Several hundred thousand people have been uprooted from their homes and communities and forced to seek refuge in more than 30 different states across America. Until such time as they are able to take up new lives in their new communities or return to their former homes, they will be refugees."
James Kelly, president of the Seattle Urban League, said the term "refugee" conjures feelings among African Americans that they're not full citizens. "As opposed to being in this situation as a result of a conflict or tribal war in Somalia or Eastern Europe, these are American citizens uprooted by a natural catastrophe," he said.
University of Washington sociology professor Albert Black agreed. "The socio-psycho-linguistic implications are that we see each other as parts of different groups, as if we're not members of the human species," he said. "Those who have experienced racism and injustice and hostility have an antennae (that says), 'Here we go again.' "
![]() Day in Pictures Bears on trial and more |
![]() David Horsey Speaking of appeasement... |
![]() The week's best photos Great shots from the P-I staff |

more
more
more
The Big Blog
Strange Bedfellows
Seattle Real Estate News
Seattle Traffic

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy
