![]() |
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Razor-thin birds wash up on shore
Hundreds of dead auklets found on Oregon coast
Once again, things are starting to look weird along the West Coast.
A rash of bird deaths has scientists wondering if they're seeing a repeat of last year, when they were alarmed by throngs of dead birds washing up on beaches, underfed whales and the failure of Washington's largest seabird-nesting colony, among other developments.
Like last year, scientists say, this year's bird deaths appear related to changes in the marine food web that they still don't understand but that look as if they are related to unusual weather.
The dead birds are being tested for toxins, bird flu and other diseases. But many are so scrawny that researchers say it's virtually a foregone conclusion that they starved to death.
"You've got skin and little more over the breastbone," said Bob Loeffel, a biologist who has scoured one stretch of Oregon beach for 28 years. "They're thin. Razor-thin."
Dead birds have been turning up along the Pacific coast from the Columbia River south to about Newport, Ore., and in British Columbia.
The birds dying in unusually high numbers in Oregon are rhinoceros auklets, a fish-eating bird a little smaller than a crow. Before this year, Loeffel had never found more than 13 of them in March on the 4.6-mile stretch of beach he monitors. This year it will easily exceed 100, he said. His is the longest-running study of dead birds on the Northwest coast.
Hundreds of other auklets have been found up and down the Oregon coast.
"We've seen a dramatic rise in the number of rhino auklets washing up on the beaches," said Julia Parrish, a University of Washington professor who oversees a network of Northwest beach observers called the Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team. "One thing that's given us pause is waiting to see if this is a several-week event, or is this going to go on longer?"
For now, she said, it appears restricted in the United States to the Oregon coast.
In Canada, the confirmed deaths have been among Cassin's auklets, and they mostly occurred from late December to early February. It's not uncommon for juveniles to die, but this time adults were found dead.
"We believe they starved to death, but we really don't know the linkages here, whether it's related to what we saw last summer," said Robert Elner, chief of migratory bird conservation for the Canadian Wildlife Service. "There's something happening. ... We've got signals that there's something amiss."
Researchers are convinced that much of what they saw in 2005 was related to an interruption of the normal spring weather patterns, with overly warm, nutrition-poor ocean water hanging around when cold, food-filled ocean water normally moves in. They say it's easy to see why that happened: Wind that usually kicks up this time of year failed to do so.
But they don't know why the wind didn't blow.
Could this year's wave of deaths be bird flu? Lab tests could show that, but "it's highly, highly unlikely," said the UW's Parrish.
Cassin's auklets begin to congregate along the coast in preparation for breeding early in the year, before the rhino auklets, Parrish said. Then, in March, the rhino auklets do the same thing. It's usual to see some of them die, but perhaps 10 times as many as normal are washing up this year.
"It seems like some combination of weather and local food shortage," she said. "That is potentially why whatever happened didn't affect other species: They weren't here."
One possibility is that the birds didn't get as much food as normal last summer, then had to weather a relatively cold and rainy winter and died because their fat reserves were exhausted earlier than usual, Parrish said.
There are some reasons to think that this year will be better. For instance, in the Farallon Islands off San Francisco, where birds showed up late to breed in 2005 and later abandoned their nests, they seem to be back to their normal pattern, Parrish said.
Dave Mackas, a biologist with the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, noted that the warmer-than-usual ocean conditions started around 2002 and appeared to peak last year. The Oregon coast and ocean were hardest hit, with lesser effects stretching to the north and south, he said.
"My bet is 2006 won't be as bad as 2005," Mackas said. "But it doesn't mean we won't see another 2005 down the line if the ocean gets warmer."
![]() | ||
With ocean temperatures warming to unusually high levels over the past three years, scientists noted a string of odd happenings affecting marine life from northern California to Alaska.
Here is what has happened this year:
What happened in 2004-2005:
![]() Day in Pictures Festive lights and more |
![]() A season of indulgences Give yourself the gift of lowbrow fun |
![]() Photo gallery The week's best P-I photos |

more
more
more
The Big Blog
Strange Bedfellows
Seattle Real Estate News
Seattle Traffic

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy
