Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp

Thursday, January 31, 2008
Last updated February 28, 2008 12:14 a.m. PT

A look at 'force' incidents in which cops weren't disciplined

By ERIC NALDER
P-I INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER

Most police officers accused of using excessive force by citizens are either exonerated because their actions were lawful or the charges are ruled unfounded, meaning the event never happened. If the evidence is inconclusive, the finding is not sustained. If the department feels there was wrongdoing, the finding is sustained, which means misconduct occurred. If policy violations are deemed not willful, or if errors do not rise to the level of misconduct, then the officer is given retraining under a nondisciplinary category called supervisory intervention.

Here are cases in which supervisory intervention was ordered:

  • An officer Tased an apparent bystander "before assessing the situation," admitting later she wanted to avoid having to chase the man and leave "other people" at the scene of a disturbance. She also claimed she didn't feel she had to file the normal use-of-force report because "the only force used was to protect the complainant from hurting himself."

  • A witness complained an officer Tased a man too long. The witness said her wrist was bent back and she was arrested when she tried to intervene.

  • An uninvolved couple told investigators that an officer slammed a skateboarder against a light pole downtown. The investigators rejected the officer's claim that when he confronted the young man over jaywalking he had taken a "bladed stance" with his legs apart and at an angle, and that he held his skateboard across his body, indicating aggression. "For the record, the 'bladed stance' argument is overworked and is not necessarily an indicator of preparation to attack offensively," investigators wrote. Though they didn't buy the officer's claims, the department rejected a recommendation that he be disciplined, and he got supervisory intervention.

  • Two officers were parked side by side in their patrol cars when one sarcastically broadcast to a curious passer-by over his loudspeaker, "Haven't you ever seen a police car before?" The exchange ended with the citizen, who taunted the officers, bent over the hood of the car and searched for weapons before being released. Supervisory intervention was imposed on one of the officers who used profanity.

  • A woman complained that she was forcefully escorted to a patrol car for violating the dog scoop ordinance, bruising her arm in the process.

  • A man complaining about a bad haircut was escorted out of the barbershop by an officer who twisted his arm. When the man reached for the cop's nametag, the officer bumped him and yelled at him, the man said. No supervisor was called to the scene, and the man had a right to have his 'bad haircut' remedied, the department concluded in ordering supervisory intervention.

  • Soundoff (Read 28 comments)
    What do you think?
    Add P-I Local headlines to
    My web site My Yahoo! Google *More options
    The Strong Arm of the Law

    NEW IN THIS REPORT:
    'OBSTRUCTING' JUSTICE

    Not charged, transient spends 3 months in jail -- forgotten
    Because of a lapse in paperwork, a Seattle homeless man spent more than three months in jail for an "obstructing a public officer" offense that prosecutors didn't even pursue.

    Unit racks up most 'obstructing' arrests
    The Seattle Police Department's Anti-Crime Team is a small squad with a tough reputation. Members pride themselves on preventing crime before it happens.

    Officer Dornay: A tale of two different cops
    A look at a cop who is the public face of proactive policing in Seattle.

    Peter Brian's 'obstruction' arrest could be case study
    A big issue at trial was just how Peter Thomas Brian got his head cut open -- badly -- while running from Seattle police officers in Pioneer Square that night.

    Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate
    Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account.
    - Police respond to our conclusions
    - Department to urge review of 'obstruct' busts
    - How we analyzed the data

    Case files:
    - Police record of questioned strip-search
    - Dubious bust leaves 'unseen injury' for life
    - Bloody 'obstruction' arrest leads to acquittal
    - Cops use 'obstruct' charge as leverage

    PREVIOUSLY ...

    - Violent force by police gets a pass
    - 'Force' incidents in which cops weren't disciplined
    - Law firm gets millions to defend cops
    - Cops who lie don't always lose jobs

    ADVERTISING
    Advertising
    OUR AFFILIATES
    NWsource KOMO
    Pacific Publishing

    Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    101 Elliott Ave. W.
    Seattle, WA 98119
    (206) 448-8000

    Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
    seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
    and 30 million page views each month.

    Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
    Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
    ©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

    Hearst Newspapers