![]() |
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Iraq War: Air of permanence
While most Americans are focused on how soon U.S. troops can get out of Iraq, the Army and Air Force are pouring an awful lot of concrete there.
An Associated Press investigative report suggests that there is a certain air of permanence to the military construction we're doing in Iraq. Massive development at several U.S. outposts raises the prospect that the administration may be contemplating the U.S. installations designed to outlast insurgency and the creation of a stable Iraqi government.
The administration may see strategic advantages to a U.S. military footprint in the oil-rich but volatile Middle East. It would give the military more "punch" than aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf and perhaps deter aggression by Iran.
But the risks are vast. U.S. military presence in the Middle East was among the rationale claimed by Osama bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks. The establishment of long-term U.S. bases would shatter the administration's claim that Americans are in Iraq as "liberators, not occupiers."
Cynics might argue that a Mideast military foothold is a more believable motive for Bush's invasion of Iraq than the capture of weapons of mass destruction, ferreting out terrorists or bringing democracy to the Iraqis.
If the administration doesn't intend to create permanent bases in Iraq, why not clearly say so? Or devote the $1 billion proposed for military construction there to providing Iraqis with electricity and water.
![]() | |
| Would it be a mistake to build permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq? | |
Yes. |
No. |
Don't know or care. |
|
| Total Votes: 790 | |

more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy
